October 15, 2007

Michael Clayton

Psychological Drama + splash of Legal Thriller + George Clooney = arresting film

Let me tell you, George Clooney was made to wear suits! I can't explain it better than he just looks fabulous and at home in them, even if he is hauling it up a wooded hill. (No spoilers, but when you do get to that particular scene, I think you will find it tense, but also emotionally satisfying and perhaps oddly compelling; I did.)

"Legal Thriller" is not my cup of tea. I have never read a John Grisham book (although I seem to have seen almost all of the movie adaptations of them.) and don't really intend too. I didn't think A Civil Action was particularly noteworthy, nor did I go gaga over The Insider. Nope, high fantasy is more to my taste. Even though I walked in to the film more than a little biased, I realized that the movie was more an exploration of the characters than a story bogged down in Erin Brockovich-ian chemistry details, minus the flip, sassy fun. "Exploration of character" sounds terribly boring, but Clooney manages to keep his "legal bag man" role real; this guy is actually relate-able and not smarmy, as one would expect.

Tom Wilkinson is cringe-worthy in his manic madness, which only proves to me that he is a good actor, even if I don't always enjoy seeing his characters (Normal, anyone?!? What a spiritually yucky movie). I do have to ask; what was up with the 6 bottles of Lysol on his butcher's block of a kitchen counter? I think they served two purposes:
1) To show how bonkers his character was and
2) To secure more product-placement revenue to offset the production budget.
I personally kept waiting for him to down it all in a fit of suicidal madness, but it wasn't really that kind of movie.

Tilda Swinton was great, as always, but how in the world did they make her look fat? Seriously, she is almost bone. The jacket she was wearing in her last scene did the trick, and was horridly atrocious. Her acting, however, was fantastic! It was fascinating to see her tightly controlled exterior come crashing down. Along the way, we were treated with snippets of scenes of her prepping for her day, working through her carefully-delivered wording as Head Councilor for a multinational corporation. I think Ms. Swinton turned a character who could have been an automaton on the page into someone the audience can almost feel sympathy for.
To me, she is a magnetic curiosity; I feel compelled to watch her. My favorite role of hers was the splendidly andogynous Gabriel in Constantine, but judging from IMDB, she is the go-to actress for indy gender-bending. Terrific; I can hardly think of a better person to do it (although Cate Blanchett may give Tilda a run for her money in I'm Not There.)

--Note: There is more text to follow, but I have recently been informed that my posts are "insanely long", so I will break off here and add a "comment" that contains the rest of my review. I also promise that it will be less gossip-y from here on out, focusing more on the plot and structure of the movie.--

2 comments:

Naps-a-lot Bear said...

--continued--

All in all, I really felt knocked off-balance at the beginning of the movie, having missed the first minute or so, but I think that was the point of the time-shift. It happens only once and early on, but I am not sure it was used to the greatest effect. It was a pleasure though, to view the final scene with George Clooney in the cab. Watching the emotions cross his face, only to have them swiftly repressed, was interesting. I wanted to witness and feel the catharsis of a break of sorrow, but did not get it. Perhaps the tension created by waiting for an expectation that was going to ultimately remain unfulfilled serves as a testament to Mr. Clooney's talents. Even if a bit frustrating, I think that scene leaves the appropriate 'taste' in the viewer's consciousness, as they file out of the theater to begin mulling everything over.

I am not sure, however, that I really had a use for the business with the 'responsible brother' and the 'loser brother', as well as the failed bar-venture that comes along in the package. Both brothers served as plot advancements, and the loser brother certainly created a reason to go into Michael Clayton's motivations for having such a sharky job, but ultimately I felt like it was a lot to chew over for very little result. These relationships serve to create the structure of his character, as well as his world. I got more out of his relationship to his son, and I have to say that the conversation that Clayton has with him in the car after the family get-together is interesting. I think it illuminated a lot about Clayton's struggles; rather than reassuring his son about how he thinks his son will not turn out to be like the loser brother/uncle, he is trying to reassure himself. Perhaps this is fairly obvious, but the scene stuck with me, and I got a lot out of it.

In sum, I liked the movie more than I thought I would, but I still could have waited for video. I do want to re-watch it, but more for the ability to sit and mull things over with a pause button; I think that the movie would have had a greater effect on me with a second viewing. Marching toward a conclusion suits some movies, but perhaps not this one--there is a bit to absorb and I am not sure that I had enough time to, given the pacing of events. That is fine, however, and more of a personal choice; any slower, and the "exploration of character" would have tipped over into "ponderously boring." I know that this type of movie is beloved of Oscars panelists, and I predict that it will be a contender for an award, come January (geez, I can't believe that I am talking about Oscars; I despise how early the buzz starts!). I am also confident that my grandparents will very much enjoy this movie. Perhaps that is a critical 'kiss of death' to anyone who is in my age demographic, but there you have it. It's the truth, but I am not sure that it can be adjusted. (What an awful tagline that I feel has very little to do with the plot of the film.)

Lunanshee said...

I walked out of "Michael Clayton" (this is the first movie I walked out in at least the last 5 years). The previews portray a fast-paced legal drama, when that is hardly the case at all. None of the characters are likeable; in fact I pretty much wished bad things for every character in there. After an hour and a half I still had no clear plot, direction or any investment in the characters. I will admit that the acting itself was first rate, but that doesn't mean much to me if I can't stand the script. I was really bored (and rather disgusted by the language and situations the characters used and referred to). Sorry, but I don't have anything good to say about "Michael Clayton". Perhaps I just don't appreciate Clooney produced dramas. I didn't like Syriana either.